Wayback Machinekoobas.hobune.stream
May JUN Jul
Previous capture 12 Next capture
2021 2022 2023
1 capture
12 Jun 22 - 12 Jun 22
sparklines
Close Help
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Made with Unity
  • Learning
  • Support & Services
  • Community
  • Asset Store
  • Get Unity

UNITY ACCOUNT

You need a Unity Account to shop in the Online and Asset Stores, participate in the Unity Community and manage your license portfolio. Login Create account
  • Blog
  • Forums
  • Answers
  • Evangelists
  • User Groups
  • Beta Program
  • Advisory Panel

Navigation

  • Home
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Made with Unity
  • Learning
  • Support & Services
  • Community
    • Blog
    • Forums
    • Answers
    • Evangelists
    • User Groups
    • Beta Program
    • Advisory Panel

Unity account

You need a Unity Account to shop in the Online and Asset Stores, participate in the Unity Community and manage your license portfolio. Login Create account

Language

  • Chinese
  • Spanish
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Ask a question
  • Spaces
    • Default
    • Help Room
    • META
    • Moderators
    • Topics
    • Questions
    • Users
    • Badges
  • Home /
avatar image
0
Question by Bob_work · May 16, 2020 at 06:50 AM · physx

It is strongly recommended that Unity officially support PhysX (Havok) calculations to be moved to the GPU!

It is strongly recommended that Unity officially support PhysX (Havok) calculations to be moved to the GPU! Does Unity3D can move physical computing to GPU? If not implemented now, can unity3D support it in the future? My reason is: a 2-hand GTX660 does not exceed $ 30, but the single-precision floating-point computing power has 2.46TFlops, which is more than 5 times the floating-point performance of the top CPUs! And from the point of view of the Windows task manager, unity3D is difficult to make the CPU usage of the game exceed 40% while running. Therefore, it is now necessary to transfer PhysX's physical computing to the GPU (as a physical computing card). And I downloaded Fluid Mark 1.5.4 and tested PhysX's physical computing ability. My graphics card is GTX1080ti, and the result is 250,000 particles with an average frame rate of 48 frames, so a GTX1080ti (11.5TFlops) should be able to calculate 12,000,000 particles per second. It's Fluid caculations, hundry times maybe thousand times of rigibody's caculations. (if somebody know this please tell me the accurate numbers) I also checked the floating-point computing capability of the GTX660 graphics card, it's 1881.6GFlops, almost 1/6 of 1080ti. Then the GTX660 can calculate 2 million fluid particles per second. At the situaiton of 30 frames per second, it will be 66,666 particles per frame. If I only need to caculate rigibody collision, maybe I can caculate over 1 million rigibodys per FRAME! I really need that! And Unity 2019.3 supports the New mid-phase function, and it can be greatly optimized to reduce a lot of calculations. So, it is time to support PhysX running on GPU. (For AMD, Havok is also okay, as long as developers use the same APIs)

Comment
Add comment
10 |3000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

1 Reply

· Add your reply
  • Sort: 
avatar image
0

Answer by Bob_work · May 16, 2020 at 06:50 AM

Please help me to @unity3D official. Thanks.

Comment
Add comment · Share
10 |3000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Your answer

Hint: You can notify a user about this post by typing @username

Up to 2 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 524.3 kB each and 1.0 MB total.

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

125 People are following this question.

avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image

Related Questions

Adding physics to various terrain 1 Answer

How can I call PhysX's simulate() and fetchResults() directly? 0 Answers

Physics is not accurate enough. 3 Answers

Capsule Collider moving through vertical terrain 0 Answers

Non-PhysX sphere - AABB intersections 0 Answers


Enterprise
Social Q&A

Social
Subscribe on YouTube social-youtube Follow on LinkedIn social-linkedin Follow on Twitter social-twitter Follow on Facebook social-facebook Follow on Instagram social-instagram

Footer

  • Purchase
    • Products
    • Subscription
    • Asset Store
    • Unity Gear
    • Resellers
  • Education
    • Students
    • Educators
    • Certification
    • Learn
    • Center of Excellence
  • Download
    • Unity
    • Beta Program
  • Unity Labs
    • Labs
    • Publications
  • Resources
    • Learn platform
    • Community
    • Documentation
    • Unity QA
    • FAQ
    • Services Status
    • Connect
  • About Unity
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Press
    • Partners
    • Affiliates
    • Security
Copyright © 2020 Unity Technologies
  • Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Cookies Settings
"Unity", Unity logos, and other Unity trademarks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Unity Technologies or its affiliates in the U.S. and elsewhere (more info here). Other names or brands are trademarks of their respective owners.
  • Anonymous
  • Sign in
  • Create
  • Ask a question
  • Spaces
  • Default
  • Help Room
  • META
  • Moderators
  • Explore
  • Topics
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Badges