Wayback Machinekoobas.hobune.stream
May JUN Jul
Previous capture 13 Next capture
2021 2022 2023
1 capture
13 Jun 22 - 13 Jun 22
sparklines
Close Help
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Made with Unity
  • Learning
  • Support & Services
  • Community
  • Asset Store
  • Get Unity

UNITY ACCOUNT

You need a Unity Account to shop in the Online and Asset Stores, participate in the Unity Community and manage your license portfolio. Login Create account
  • Blog
  • Forums
  • Answers
  • Evangelists
  • User Groups
  • Beta Program
  • Advisory Panel

Navigation

  • Home
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Made with Unity
  • Learning
  • Support & Services
  • Community
    • Blog
    • Forums
    • Answers
    • Evangelists
    • User Groups
    • Beta Program
    • Advisory Panel

Unity account

You need a Unity Account to shop in the Online and Asset Stores, participate in the Unity Community and manage your license portfolio. Login Create account

Language

  • Chinese
  • Spanish
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Ask a question
  • Spaces
    • Default
    • Help Room
    • META
    • Moderators
    • Topics
    • Questions
    • Users
    • Badges
  • Home /
This question was closed Apr 25 at 11:50 AM by zarriel for the following reason:

The question is answered, right answer was accepted

avatar image
0
Question by zarriel · Feb 06 at 02:55 AM · methods

GetComponent vs TryGetComponent

I know what is a difference between GetComponent and TryGetComponent methods and as I understand the second one is better to avoid allocate memory. But are there situations where GetComponent is better or we just can't use TryGetComponent? I'm asking because if TryGetComponent is just better and there is no reason to not use it, then what's the case to use GetComponent?

Comment
Add comment · Show 1
10 |3000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users
avatar image mpbMKE · Apr 27 at 04:18 PM 0
Share

Since TryGetComponent<>() was new as of the 2019 release, you can safely think of GetComponent<>() as a legacy feature to support older codebases so they don't break when they're imported to newer versions of the editor.

That said, some people are set in their ways, so they're just going to keep using GetComponent anyhow, and there really isn't a compelling reason not to keep supporting that function, so essentially it's just giving you a choice of which to use, one of which has a negligible performance boost but might be more efficient to write out once you get used to it.

TL;DR: It comes down to personal preference, but TryGetComponent is probably the best practice to incorporate going forward.

1 Reply

  • Sort: 
avatar image
1
Best Answer

Answer by perf401 · Feb 06 at 12:51 PM

Not an expert, but I think memory allocation is happening only in the Editor. But yeah it's fine to always use TryGetComponent, i don't think there any situations where Get component is better.

Comment
Add comment · Share
10 |3000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

135 People are following this question.

avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image

Related Questions

Good practice to do a base extend of MonoBehaviour? 1 Answer

Trying to run 5 instances of a static method at once to do an action, probably a dumb thing to do? 0 Answers

MonoBehaviour methods in non-MonoBehaviour class 1 Answer

Both static and non-static method is giving me an error 2 Answers

How can run method from unknown type of script? 0 Answers


Enterprise
Social Q&A

Social
Subscribe on YouTube social-youtube Follow on LinkedIn social-linkedin Follow on Twitter social-twitter Follow on Facebook social-facebook Follow on Instagram social-instagram

Footer

  • Purchase
    • Products
    • Subscription
    • Asset Store
    • Unity Gear
    • Resellers
  • Education
    • Students
    • Educators
    • Certification
    • Learn
    • Center of Excellence
  • Download
    • Unity
    • Beta Program
  • Unity Labs
    • Labs
    • Publications
  • Resources
    • Learn platform
    • Community
    • Documentation
    • Unity QA
    • FAQ
    • Services Status
    • Connect
  • About Unity
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Press
    • Partners
    • Affiliates
    • Security
Copyright © 2020 Unity Technologies
  • Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Cookies Settings
"Unity", Unity logos, and other Unity trademarks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Unity Technologies or its affiliates in the U.S. and elsewhere (more info here). Other names or brands are trademarks of their respective owners.
  • Anonymous
  • Sign in
  • Create
  • Ask a question
  • Spaces
  • Default
  • Help Room
  • META
  • Moderators
  • Explore
  • Topics
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Badges