koobas.hobune.stream
Would one person's editor extension mess up our GIT pipeline?
I am part of a small team that collaborates over GIT. I'm interested in buying an animation editor extension just for myself, since I'm the only one implementing animation. But would it cause problems for out project if one person adds content with an asset that the other designers don't have? Would the build still look and work okay for them, and could they push their own changes and have it work as well? And I guess from a legal standpoint, I’m wondering if it’s okay for other designers to work around my content if they have neither the asset nor the license for it. Thank you
This example - an animation editor extension - sounds fine to me. Animation is just bones, an editor extension to help with that doesn't sound like it's adding any assets, its just helping you rotate bones better.
It only causes problems if the extension creates any data for itself and doesn't use the standard systems.
Cool, that sounds promising. Is that usually the case, that editor extensions just make it easier to use Unity data, and not so much creating any proprietary data themselves?
It depends on the extension. I'm not the best person to ask about extensions from the asset store, I don't use them.
