Wayback Machinekoobas.hobune.stream
May JUN Jul
Previous capture 13 Next capture
2021 2022 2023
1 capture
13 Jun 22 - 13 Jun 22
sparklines
Close Help
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Made with Unity
  • Learning
  • Support & Services
  • Community
  • Asset Store
  • Get Unity

UNITY ACCOUNT

You need a Unity Account to shop in the Online and Asset Stores, participate in the Unity Community and manage your license portfolio. Login Create account
  • Blog
  • Forums
  • Answers
  • Evangelists
  • User Groups
  • Beta Program
  • Advisory Panel

Navigation

  • Home
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Made with Unity
  • Learning
  • Support & Services
  • Community
    • Blog
    • Forums
    • Answers
    • Evangelists
    • User Groups
    • Beta Program
    • Advisory Panel

Unity account

You need a Unity Account to shop in the Online and Asset Stores, participate in the Unity Community and manage your license portfolio. Login Create account

Language

  • Chinese
  • Spanish
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Ask a question
  • Spaces
    • Default
    • Help Room
    • META
    • Moderators
    • Topics
    • Questions
    • Users
    • Badges
  • Home /
avatar image
0
Question by jmargaris · Oct 22, 2014 at 01:54 AM · meshoptimizationefficiency

Efficient mesh vertex count changes?

I have a mesh I am constructing in code and I want to dynamically add and remove vertices. Right now it looks to me that to change the vertex count I have to specify a completely new array for the mesh.

Is there any way to avoid this? I am thinking something along the lines of I give mesh an array of indices as well as a length, which is uses instead of the actual array length. So in that case if I had an array of 100 verts capacity I could use only 4 of those verts one time, then 10 verts the next time, etc, without having to every create new arrays and later free them. (I want to avoid dynamic constant dynamic allocation / deallocation)

As far as I know in C# there is no way to have an array point to some shared memory - ArraySegment looked promising but it doesn't really do that. Nor can I subclass array.

Maybe there is some C++ magic that can be done to accomplish this? Again, the key goal is to allocate an array with some capacity and then feed that into mesh for vertices / indices / etc such that the length can be different from the capacity and I don't have to allocate new arrays for each length change.

Comment
Add comment
10 |3000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

1 Reply

· Add your reply
  • Sort: 
avatar image
1

Answer by robertbu · Oct 22, 2014 at 01:56 AM

As a suggestion, declare your vertices array with 100 vertices, then use only what you want. It is the triangles that matter, not the vertices. I don't think there is an issue with unused vertices in the vertices array. You'll have to run a test to be sure.

Edit: I just tested it, and oversizing the vertices array works just fine. If used, the uv array the normals and the colors array will have to be sized to match the vertices array.

Comment
Add comment · Show 1 · Share
10 |3000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users
avatar image Bunderant · Aug 11, 2015 at 03:45 AM 0
Share

Thank you so much for this tip. Creating new arrays for vertices, triangles, and uv coordinates for each mesh was just not efficient enough for what I'm doing, strea$$anonymous$$g procedural meshes in a 2.5D game. Only worrying about triangles should help out a bunch with garbage collection. I really wish Unity's $$anonymous$$eshFilter would accept an ArraySegment for each of those properties.

Your answer

Hint: You can notify a user about this post by typing @username

Up to 2 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 524.3 kB each and 1.0 MB total.

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

2 People are following this question.

avatar image avatar image

Related Questions

So what's Mesh.UploadMeshData do exactly? 3 Answers

Accessing mesh vertices is extremely inefficient; any workarounds? 0 Answers

Differentiate an overlapping collision from just touching 1 Answer

Public, private and getting stuff efficiency question. 2 Answers

What do I add to the LOD Renderer in MonoBehaviour? 2 Answers


Enterprise
Social Q&A

Social
Subscribe on YouTube social-youtube Follow on LinkedIn social-linkedin Follow on Twitter social-twitter Follow on Facebook social-facebook Follow on Instagram social-instagram

Footer

  • Purchase
    • Products
    • Subscription
    • Asset Store
    • Unity Gear
    • Resellers
  • Education
    • Students
    • Educators
    • Certification
    • Learn
    • Center of Excellence
  • Download
    • Unity
    • Beta Program
  • Unity Labs
    • Labs
    • Publications
  • Resources
    • Learn platform
    • Community
    • Documentation
    • Unity QA
    • FAQ
    • Services Status
    • Connect
  • About Unity
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Press
    • Partners
    • Affiliates
    • Security
Copyright © 2020 Unity Technologies
  • Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Cookies Settings
"Unity", Unity logos, and other Unity trademarks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Unity Technologies or its affiliates in the U.S. and elsewhere (more info here). Other names or brands are trademarks of their respective owners.
  • Anonymous
  • Sign in
  • Create
  • Ask a question
  • Spaces
  • Default
  • Help Room
  • META
  • Moderators
  • Explore
  • Topics
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Badges