koobas.hobune.stream
The question is answered, right answer was accepted
Array of variable-length arrays (JS)
Here's a capsule version of my problem:
Working on a tile-based game; I want to select a unit and calculate all paths for that unit to any hex it can reach.
I do this by doing essentially two layered pathfinding routines, the first one simply picks the first object off an open list, then calls an A-Star routine to calculate the move cost to that hex. If it is more than the moves available, the outer loop moves on. If it is movable, the outer loop adds its neighbors to the open list, and moves to the next item on the open list. When it is done, it has found all the paths, and the A-Star part has stored the paths in an array on each hex, ready and available to use on demand, as MouseOver to highlight the path.
This is working perfectly, but it is slow. It takes 8-10 seconds to process each selection, which is obviously not workable.
What I would like to do is modify my A-Star so that it can do all the paths at the same time. The problem is that my A-Star uses variables on the map hexes themselves, so I basically need to change any variables A-Star uses into arrays, and have one for each potential path on the board. No problem for the variables that are singletons, GCost becomes GCost[MapSize], but when it comes to the Open and Closed list arrays that A-Star is using, I'm at a loss for how to deal with it.
Essentially, I want make an array of a fixed size, each element of which is an array of variable size.
I know I'm close, but everything I have read about how to approach this has confused the heck out of me... I know I'm not stupid, I'm just having trouble getting my head around the proper syntax to do what I want.
PS: if anyone has any better ideas how to multi-thread this pathfinding, I'm completely open to the possibility that what I'm asking might not be the best answer... ;)
I figured it out. If you are interested, here is a section of test code.
var One: GameObject; var Two: GameObject; var Three: GameObject;
function Start () { // define a JS Array var JSArray = new Array(); // define a Unity array var Builtin = new Array[3];
// add some stuff to the JS array
JSArray.Add(One);
JSArray.Add(Two);
JSArray.Add(Three);
// assign the JS array to index 0 of the Unity array
Builtin[0] = JSArray;
// prints the three objects in System
Debug.Log(JSArray);
// prints the copy of System that was assigned
Debug.Log(Builtin[0]);
// shows that you can still use the array commands on the items inside the Unity array
Builtin[0].Add(One);
Builtin[0].Add(Two);
Builtin[0].Add(Three);
// prints the six objects in the array now
Debug.Log(Builtin[0]);
}
System just might be the worst possible variable name except for var. Its a namespace and it makes much harder to read because it looks like you are trying to access a namespace when you really aren't.
Seriously? Pedantic much? This was just an example to show syntax. But I've removed the offensive variable name...
