koobas.hobune.stream
JointDriveMode is obsolete, any alternatives?
I had a C# code where i'd use JointDriveMode to set Configurable Joint data directly from code.
[SerializeField]
private JointDriveMode mode;
[SerializeField]
private float jointSpring = 20f;
[SerializeField]
private float jointMaxForce = 40f;
Now that it's obsolete, what do i do? I need an alternative for my code to work.
I've got the same problem. $$anonymous$$y code add configurable joints on the fly and sets the mode to either Position or Velocity. So, how am I supposed to do this now? The docs say something about the flags were incorrectly applied anyway - but what's the work around?
$$anonymous$$ight as well credit the above code to Brackeys tutorial on youtube: $$anonymous$$aking a $$anonymous$$ultiplayer FPS in Unity. I'm at the same point as well after an upgrade to 5.3.
Yeah, I was working with the same thing and there doesn't seem to be any easy way to replace JointDrive$$anonymous$$ode that's compatible with this method at all.
Alright, as far as I can tell from my research, the mode functionality is gone, so you just comment out
//[SerializeField]
//private JointDriveMode mode;
and then also remove the commented out code here
private void SetJointSettings(float _jointSpring)
{
joint.yDrive = new JointDrive
{
//mode = jointMode, //remove this here
positionSpring = _jointSpring,
maximumForce = jointMaxForce
};
}
the joint mode functionality here. I'm fairly sure instead you just have to tweak some things about your joint in the unity editor, or use a configurable joint from the start if you really want the same effect Brackey's achieved. I don't really know what joint mode did but it doesn't exist anymore, however I am fairly sure that it's functionality exists via multiple varied settings in configurable joint.
see: http://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/UpgradeGuide53.html at JointDriveMode Flags
Can confirm, just commented the mode section out, no more errors and the player still moves the same way. Thank you Yakri
Thank you! It works completely fine without that code, so I wonder why they made it unusable?
